The New Commentary on the Whole Bible, editors J.D. Douglas, Philip W. Comfort, brings up the interesting possibility that Simeon called Niger who appears in Acts 13:1 is the same person as Simon of Cyrene mentioned in the Synoptic Gospels as the man who helped Jesus carry His cross. I believe this is true, though I’ve yet to see anything beyond a couple of quick cross-references as to how we can come to that conclusion. Probably no one has written much about it because it doesn’t really matter.
Anyway here goes:
First of all, to explain the difference in the names, Simeon and Simon are alternate spellings of the same name.
Everything we know about Simon who carried the cross is summed up in this verse from Mark:
Mark 15:21 (NKJV) Then they compelled a certain man, Simon a Cyrenian, the father of Alexander and Rufus, as he was coming out of the country and passing by, to bear His cross.
- He was from Cyrene, on the North Coast of Africa.
- His sons were named Alexander and Rufus.
What we know about Simeon called Niger is his name. Simeon is a Jewish name and Niger comes from the Latin for “black”. It’s safe to say he was Jewish and may have been called “Black” simply because of his looks.
There are and long have been dark-skinned Jews. They are a minority, to be sure, but they mainly come from Africa. For an example with a picture See This Post. Might Simon of Cyrene have been one of them? Why not? Cyrene, on the African coast, is as good a place as any to look for a man with dark skin. So those two facts help connect our guys Niger and Simon. And there is more.
If we check out Acts 11:19-21 we find that the church in Antioch, where we first met Niger, was founded by men from Cyprus and Cyrene. So here is another connection. Niger is not said to be from Cyrene in Acts 13, but he’s not said to be from anywhere, so Cyrene is a good possibility, considering he was a leader in a church founded by Cyrenians.
John Mark is the evangelist who mentions Simon’s sons, Alexander and Rufus. We know from tradition and several Latin words in the Greek text that Mark was writing his Gospel to a largely Roman audience. So that can help connect Rufus with the Rufus mentioned by Paul in Romans 16:13. We know from Romans 16:13 that Paul apparently knew Rufus’s mother.
Romans 16:13 (NKJV) Greet Rufus, chosen in the Lord, and his mother and mine.
So now we can begin to connect the dots into a possible history:
Simon of Cyrene became a believer in Jesus Christ and his sons were well-known in the early church. He later travelled to Antioch and helped get the church there started. His wife and sons were with him. In Antioch he received the nickname Niger, “the black guy” for being a dark-skinned Jew. (People in Antioch like to give nicknames, but that would have to be another post.) He was later joined in Antioch by Paul (then Saul of Tarsus) and, later yet, John Mark, who both got to know and love him, his wife and sons.
Years later, after Simon’s/Niger’s death, his wife and son Rufus were living in Rome. They were prominent in the church there in part because of the unique role Simon played in the Gospel story. Writing to a Roman audience, Mark mentions Rufus and Alexander, because he and the Roman church knew them personally. Paul, writing to the Romans, greets Rufus and his mom for the same reason.
to Christ - in Christ - for Christ
This is very well done! I never dug into the why some have arrived at the conclusion they did about his origin and history. Valuable, I am printing off to stick in my commentary file.
Thanks!
Thanks Jim. I’m glad you took the time to read it.
Thanks for this – trawling web for woefully short supply of material for sunday school lessons for black history month (it’s a good thing I’m late!)
Thank you Barbara,
I’m happy that post could be used in that way!
How about King Solomon?Sheba meant “of the black”.Is it possible that Bath-Sheba,his mother was black? Is it possible that it is also why Queen of Sheba was so keen to meet another prominent black leader.Also read this from Songs of Solomon: verse 5 “Dark am I, yet lovely,
O daughters of Jerusalem,
Dark like the tents of Kedar,
Like the tent curtains of Solomon. [c]
6 Do not stare at me because I am dark,
Because I am darkened by the sun.
My mother’s sons were angry with me
And made me take care of the vineyards;
My own vineyard I have neglected.”
I also dont know why nor understand why his brothers were forcing him to look after their vineyards at the cost of his own.
Thanks Richard,
No question the Shulamite of the Song of Solomon was dark; she says so herself.
As for Bathsheba and Solomon, I’m guessing they were both darker than usually pictured in Bible illustrations, which tend to make all these Middle Eastern people look a tad more European than seems likely. Go figure.
Regarding “of the black” as the meaning of “Sheba”, I wonder if you might quote a source for that. Outside of the proper name “Sheba”, I kind of thought the Hebrew word “sheba” or “sheva” had something to do with the number seven, or possibly “oath” as Brown-Driver-Briggs Hebrew lexicon suggests. See link below. I believe the usual Hebrew word for black is “shacor”, but I’m willing to bend on that if you can convince me.
http://www.searchgodsword.org/lex/heb/view.cgi?number=07614
Here’s another link with Hebrew numbers:
http://www.dictionary.co.il/view.php?offset=0&topics=h0302&limit=10
Thanks Dave,
See added notes from the searchgodsword site on the meaning of the word “bath”:
daughter
daughter, girl, adopted daughter, daughter-in-law, sister, granddaughters, female child, cousin
as polite address n pr f
as designation of women of a particular place
young women, women
as personification
daughter-villages
description of character
Sheba is a grandson of Cush(Black).Notes from the searchgodsword say that Sheba is
son of Raamah, grandson of Cush, and a descendant of Ham .
As for oath and seven,these are the meanings for the word ’sheva’.
I therefore concluded that Bathsheba is “daughter of Sheba” = Daughter of grandson of Cush= of the black since Cush was black.
In the old days it seems race was not significant and hence there is never a mention of race in most old texts be they Christian or Muslim or otherwise.By the way I am apostolic.
I became interested in King Solomon because his mines are suppossed to be located in my country,Zimbabwe.My ancestors built Stone Houses without any mortar.Zimba=Mansion and bwe=stone.Thats where we derive the name Zimbabwe from.These were thought to be King Solomon’s mines and the early explorers did a lot of damage to the historic site searching for gold.If you read Cecil John Rhodes ‘autobiography you will also read that he believed the whole country was an African El-dorado!So I questioned why Solomon would have mines located so far away from the East and then I had to research on all this,just out of interest.I am not a pastor nor a scientist,so my theories are probably halfbaked!
Dave thankx for the links,really usefull.
Richard, thanks again. That helps a lot.
By the way, I liked what you said: “In the old days it seems race was not significant.” I really hope that is becoming true once again. You may not be a pastor or a scientist, but Africans always seem to be good at languages. Forgive me if that sounds like a “racial” sterotype!
Dave you made my day.I dont mind the stereotyping as long as its complementary!
As for race and its importance,I believe it became more important as the competition for resources became fiercer and so one finds it much later in the history of mankind.I have seen that as competition gets worse even the races will further discriminate amongst their own kind.It becomes a monster which feeds on everyone.
As you say on your side of the ocean it seems race might no longer be that significant.
However in Africa it seems to be taking a new dimension where some races are justifying rascism because the other races discriminated against them in the past.Its only the beginning of a struggle. I have a rather broad view on the issue having been born and worked as a banker in Zimbabwe until 2006 when I relocated to South Africa.
I am worried what kind of future my kids will live in because even myself I am finding it hard to give a practical as well as moral view to the whole issue.
Fascinating. Here in the American bubble we find it so hard to grasp and/or appreciate the complex realities faced by the rest of the world.
That is good. It would make sense that Mark’s Gospel mentions the names of Simon’s two sons, if they were members of the church. I would classify it as hard evidence, but it’s pretty convincing proof.
BW,
p.
Interesting post, allow me to clear up a few things; if i may. Niger is Latin and it simply means Black NOT “That Black Guy”. Why would Jesus call his TWIN Brother that??? And yes Simeon and Yeshuah Ha Meshiah were BROTHERS. Contrary to popular belief, but whoah, that would make Jesus … YEAH, Black!!! Now, to further point out what MANY including the author of the post may not have seen is this, IF Simeon is from Cyrene which as stated is in NORTHERN AFRICA where exactly was Jesus from? YES, NORTH AFRICA no matter how you try to RELIGIA or RELIGIO (CONfound, tie back and CONfuse) or even make it MYsonic or Esoteric. It is TRUTH. Cush, Saudia, Ham, Kedar, Sheba (even SHIVA was DARK BLUE as well as KHRISHNA a LIGHTER BLUE as Black is hardly ever used I DID NOT SAY NEVER). Now back to the original subject, the Falasha Jews of Ethiopia or even the Ethiopian Coptic Tawedio Church which is the OLDEST Church in the World actually started by the Abbysian (BLACK) … it doesn’t take a rocket scientist. It really doesn’t.
Thanks for the comment Darre,
I agree that Niger literally means “black”. In fact that’s how I first defined it a few paragraphs before I wrote “the black guy”, which was admittedly paraphrasing.
After that, however, you kind of lost me with Jesus having a twin brother, etc, etc.
But thanks for visiting!